Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Email this to someone

R-E-S-P-E-C-TAudiences for many years loved hearing comedian Rodney Dangerfield complain, “I don’t get no respect.”  What is funny onstage and as entertainment is not so amusing in real life, however.   There appears to be a rampant case of disrespect spreading throughout the ranks of the Dallas ISD.

The trustees complained about the lack of respect they feel from one another recently at the board retreat on Saturday, July 21.  Matthew Haag of the Dallas Morning News reported that:  “Trustees agreed that they don’t effectively deliberate difficult decisions together and that they are disrespectful toward one another.”

This attitude of disdain by the DISD administration and among the trustees has developed over many years and will not be changed simply by the hiring of a PR person who will develop glitzy statements and tell us all how we should think about DISD.  A little old-fashioned RESPECT is needed in order to develop trust between the DISD administration, its’ trustees, and the public.

Respect is both given and earned. The district could go a long way in earning respect from the public by being honest in all of its dealings. They could start by posting all documents on the agenda for each board meeting and briefing, including the pertinent supporting documents. If they don’t have the documents ready in a timely fashion, then perhaps the trustees shouldn’t be discussing/voting on these issues until all the information is known. If the administration is not hiding anything, then why should they appear to be by not releasing the documents?

The trustees could earn respect from the administration by refusing to be treated like doormats.  A perfect case in point occurred at the board retreat.  The trustees were scheduled to vote on three issues:  two on the superintendent’s contract and one concerning a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).  No one from the DISD legal department was present at the retreat to answer questions from the trustees concerning the contract amendment or the TEA waiver.  Was this merely an oversight? The language for the waiver was amended during the meeting without any advice or input from DISD legal. The trustees should have demanded that someone from the legal department be present whenever they are scheduled to vote on issues, especially those involving contracts.

Even worse, the trustees passed the MOU, despite never receiving a briefing on it and despite receiving the supporting documents less than 24 hours prior to the board workshop. However, instead of tabling the issue until being adequately briefed on the MOU and making sure that they each understood the implications of it, they simply passed the measure without any discussion.  There was a briefing on the issue in the past, but many items in the documents had changed since then and the trustees deserved a full briefing on the changes. The two new trustees, Elizabeth Jones and Dan Micchiche, were not even on the board when the previous briefing took place.  I certainly hope that they stayed up all Friday night pouring over the documents to be sure that they understood everything they contained, since they both voted to pass the measure without any questions. It seems that some of the trustees just believed the word of another trustee that the MOU should be passed, without desiring to personally look into the details.

Do they know that the MOU states that: “The manner of performance of the program will be determined solely by the Executive Director of the Center on Communities and Education.”?  I take that to mean that SMU will call all the shots. Do the trustees know that they have committed many DISD resources and money to this cause?  They have agreed to assign key professionals to this team to develop, follow, and implement a plan (are these professionals going to do this for free?), expand existing AVID curriculum to all schools, develop a STEM program, provide high school to career training, expand early childhood (0-8) opportunities, among many other commitments. This all will cost money, and lots of it. These are all good things, but should we be promising all this at a time of budget cuts?  Nowhere in the document is it outlined just from where all the money for this will come. Supposedly, $25 million for Pinkston was dangled in front of the trustees as a carrot, but this is not found in the current document.

This group of trustees has set a dangerous precedent for themselves.  They have told the administration that they will pass agenda items without full knowledge of the details, and that they will pass agenda items without any advice from the DISD legal department.  They have also allowed themselves to be bullied by someone else’s deadline (in this case, SMU’s deadline for grant application) into making a decision without full disclosure.  The board has not even seen the grant application from SMU, so it cannot possibly know what it contains and if it will be as advantageous to the district as they have been led to believe. They have no assurances in writing that they will receive any money to help cover the expenses of the services they have promised to this project.

Do the trustees understand GOVERNANCE?  They should NOT vote on issues when they have not been given enough information.  They are in control of their meetings, NOT the administration. All this “going along to get along” is making them the laughingstock among school districts.  They need to grow a spine, and soon.  Whining that they “don’t get no respect” at board retreats is ineffective. They need to behave in a manner which will earn them what they want:  RESPECT.

Posted in Teachers Rule
Still Hoping After All These Years
Still Hoping After All These Years

This post is certainly timely. How respectful were Mike Morath and Nancy Bingham when they discussed Bernadette Nutall in the "oops" recorded phone call, apparently with racial overtones? I'm sure neither would use any racially motivated comments in public, but guys,it's what you do when no one is looking that defines your character.

Stranger and Stranger
Stranger and Stranger

There are so many odd circumstances regarding this MOU and the quest for federal money to improve the West Dallas community and the fortunes of those who paid $2 a square foot for property near a bridge and want their payday. Nothing but greed generated the West Dallas Chamber of Commerce or the Dallas Faith Communities Coalition. Are Dallas property tax payers to assume that their assistant superintendents will report to Regina Nippert in this quest for money for West Dallas? What exactly are Nippert's education credentials so that she is in charge of quality control for federal money? She has no education or research credentials. She is not a professor at SMU. She has a background in real estate and the land flippers around the bridge and condo developers are her peers, not the research professors who usually develop projects such as this. “The manner of performance of the program will be determined solely by the Executive Director of the Center on Communities and Education.” What? Really? And exactly how does Nippert have the authority to make this claim? So the Dallas trustees signed on for use of their top staff who will report to Nippert who will determine the "performance" standards for the school that belongs to Dallas taxpayers? Exactly why is the top leadership of a major, urban school district playing second fiddle to a real estate developer and shill for Uplift? While Pinkston is the poster child for failing high schools, it has plenty of siblings in Dallas. The difference is that none of them is located in the middle of a giant land flip. They are not an embarrassment to the icons of Dallas oil and technology fortunes who want to build monuments to their mothers. In other words, they are not inconvenient. Pinkston needs to be fixed because its failure is significant only because it's not pretty and the neighborhood needs sprucing up so property values will rise. Speaking of Spruce, could someone please build a bridge to Pleasant Grove?


  1. […] not received a briefing on the item, yet a decision was demanded of them. As a previous article (R-E-S-P-E-C-T) pointed out, this is not the first time that the administration has employed this tactic to bully […]

Recent Comments

  • Loading...



Saturday, October 17, 11:00 a.m.
Unique Visitors: 238,976
Visits: 1,073,418
Page Views: 2,117,786
Avg. Duration: 00:02:58

User Metrics
37.50% male
62.50% female
3.35% 18-24 yrs
12.54% 25-34 yrs
28.33% 35-44 yrs
25.80% 45-54 yrs
22.45% 55-64 yrs
7.54% 65+ yrs

You may make comments with your privacy completely protected! Click HERE for Detailed Instructions with Pictures

We know words are powerful and ideas even more so. Profanity isn't really necessary for emphasis or a substitute for passion here. Thank you.

Foundation for Empowerment (FCE) released 3 papers:

1. Disruptive Change: Mike Miles and the Crisis In Dallas ISD, which has been prepared with consultation by education academics, extensive research, review of data and education literature, and meetings and interviews with people of Dallas holding varying and sometimes conflicting points of view;

2. Digging Into Data and Evidence: Mike Miles, Dallas ISD, and Trickle-Down Education Report, by Dr. Julian Vasquez Helig, Lindsay Redd, M.A. and Dr. Ruth Vail; and

3. The Challenge of Disruptive Leadership in Dallas ISD, by Decoteau J. Irby, Ph.D. and Matthew Birkhold, M.A.

"You will see from these papers that, after much research and discussion, we believe the current Superintendent [Mike Miles] lacks the pedagogical, leadership and integrity qualities necessary to lead Dallas ISD and recommend the Board terminate his contract."

Citizens wanting to speak at regular board meetings and briefings must sign up by calling Board Services at (972) 925-3720 no later than 5 p.m. on the day before the meeting.

Contact the Superintendent and Trustees:
3700 Ross Avenue, Box 1
Dallas, TX 75204

Interim Superintendent Mike Hinojosa
Email coming soon

Lew Blackburn, 2nd Vice President
District 5
Term Expires May 2016
(972) 925-3718
Oak Lawn, West Dallas, Wilmer, Hutchins and portions of East Oak Cliff

Miguel Solis, 1st Vice President
District 8
Term Expires 2017
(972) 925-3721
Love Field, Northwest Dallas, and Central Dallas

Eric Cowan, President
District 7
Term Expires May 2016
(972) 925-3721
North Central Oak Cliff and parts of West Dallas

Nancy Bingham, Secretary
District 4
Term Expires May 2016
(972) 925-3722
Southeast Dallas, Seagoville, Balch Springs

Edwin Flores
District 1
Term Expires 2018
(972) 925-3722
Northwest Dallas, including North Dallas, Addison, parts of Carrollton and Farmers Branch

Mike Morath
District 2
Term Expired Dec 2015
(972) 925-3721
North and Near East Dallas

Dan Micciche
District 3
Term Expires 2018
(972) 925-3722
Northeast Dallas

Joyce Foreman
District 6
Term Expires 2017
(972) 925-3722
Southwest Dallas

Bernadette Nutall
District 9
Term Expires 2018
(972) 925-3721
South Dallas and parts of Downtown Dallas, Pleasant Grove, Deep Ellum, Uptown, and East Dallas

"Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit and intelligence of the citizens. They fall when the wise are banished from the public councils because they dare to be honest and the profligate are rewarded because they flatter the people in order to betray them." --Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833